This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Can plain bearings replace rolling element bearings in all applications?

Author : Craig Clydesdale is the head of marketing & PR at Bowman International

01 March 2018

Traditionally, there were very clear “battle lines” drawn between what applications rolling element bearings were suitable for and what applications plain (or journal) bearings could be used for.

Conventional thinking dictated that complex parts required complex ball, roller or needle bearings. That paradigm is now beginning to shift due to the advent of new bearing materials such as ToughMet. With advantages in load, corrosion, space, weight and an extremely low coefficient of friction, as well as cost savings to be had, more engineers are replacing rolling element bearings with plain bearings

Craig Clydesdale, head of marketing & PR at Bowman International, explores the various benefits of plain bearings and analyses whether they really are a viable replacement for rolling element bearings.

Simplicity in design

Until recently rolling element bearings enjoyed an unrivalled dominance in many applications and products. The traditional view of plain bearings was that they were ineffective and unable to take the same load. High load and high-speed applications were the domain of the rolling element. However we are increasingly seeing plain bearings replacing rolling element in a wide range of products as design engineers learn that plain bearings design simplicity has advantages.

One advantage that attracts project managers, design engineers and buyers alike is, of course, cost. Tooling of complex, multi-component rolling element bearings is expensive in comparison to plain bearings. The simplicity of design, ease of tooling and simple construction of plain bearings lends itself to being a more cost-effective solution. This also makes them lighter than rolling element. We are seeing more design engineers from the automotive and aerospace sectors switching to plain bearings for this very reason.

Because rolling element bearings are complex, multi-component parts they have a much larger section area than plain bearings. They consist of four main parts: the outer race, the rolling element, the cage and the inner race. Plain bearings, in contrast, are essentially comprised of a single layer of metal, plastic, or a combination thereof or a composite material. Removing the necessity to accommodate such a large part saves a significant amount of space and weight which in many applications is a precious commodity.   

It’s good to keep in contact

The much larger wetted area of plain bearings was traditionally seen as a disadvantage. A larger contact area meant friction, which was not a trait you would want associated with high speed applications. However, with the advent of self-lubricating and oil-less plain bearings this issue has become somewhat cured and the larger surface-contact area can now be seen as an advantage; designers are able to save space and cost by using smaller plain bearings that can accommodate greater loads. Because of these properties, plain bearings also better withstand shock loads which often cause fatigue damage and brinelling in rolling element bearings

Shaft misalignment is another factor that can often put roller element bearings at a disadvantage. Because load is concentrated on a narrow contact area, shaft misalignment can cause increased wear and shorten life unless the bearing has been specifically designed to compensate. Misalignment is not such an issue for plain bearings as they distribute loads evenly across the increased contact-surface area.

Silence is golden

Noise levels are always a concern that designers need to address. Rolling element bearings can be noisy. They become even noisier as they wear and/or as the lubricant migrates. Misalignment will cause vibrations which translates into noise which is then further amplified by adjacent parts within the assembly. Plain bearings have no moving parts so there is nothing to cause any audible noise. The layered structure of some of today’s plain bearings actually serves to absorb vibrations, which means less noise from bearing and shaft interaction.

AgriHubs

Another industry in which we are seeing growing demand for plain bearings is the agricultural sector. Applications within the agricultural sector are generally industrial and heavy duty and require a solution that can withstand extremely high loads, shock loads, lack of lubrication and have excellent anti-corrosion properties.

One of the biggest issues faced by rolling element bearing manufacturers is dirt and moisture contamination, the migration of the lubricant and the constant battle is to improve the seal design to guard against these problems. It has been said that rolling element bearings are only as good as their seal; the moment the seal is compromised, the bearing is obsolete and needs to be replaced. This is particularly relevant in Agrihubs.

Bowman International’s latest innovation seeks to address this problem by replacing the rolling element bearings within the hubs with its heavy duty spinodal bronze BowMet range of plain bearings.

BowMet bearings were specifically developed in 2015 for heavy duty applications that other bearings could not handle. Their load, heat, speed, low coefficient of friction and corrosion capabilities combine to offer a solution that can stand up to the harshest conditions. In replacing rolling element bearings with BowMet bearings, dirt contamination becomes less of a problem. The dirt can pass through the unit and out again without causing any significant damage.

A typical farm requires 20-30 days tillage in spring and 10-20 days tillage in autumn. At present it is accepted that a farmer will need to replace the agrihubs on his plant at least once a year, but more likely once a season. When you consider that there are around 60 to 120 hubs on a typical harrow or seeder, it is easy to see that this quickly turns into an expensive endeavour. With this in mind and looking to extend the product lifetime of the hubs, Bowman International’s team of engineers sought to replace the traditional rolling element bearings within the main unit of the hubs with its own line of heavy duty BowMet bronze plain bearings.

Conclusion

It would be reductive, and indeed incorrect, to suggest that plain bearings can replace rolling element bearings across the board. There remain applications where rolling element bearings really are the only solution. However, the simplicity of design, the cost-effectiveness, the increased reliability and the low levels of maintenance of plain bearings are beginning to steal a march on rolling element bearings as designers look to streamline their projects and reduce costs.


Contact Details and Archive...

Print this page | E-mail this page

Coda Systems