This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Robot made with smaller bots has a funky way of getting around

23 September 2019

Researchers have made a new robot entirely of smaller robots known as “smarticles” to unlock the principles of a potentially new locomotion technique.

Five identical smarticles — smart active particles — interact with one another in an enclosure. By nudging each other, the group — dubbed a “supersmarticle” — can move in random ways. (Georgia Tech Photo: Rob Felt)

Building conventional robots typically requires carefully combining components like motors, batteries, actuators, body segments, legs, and wheels.

The 3D printed smarticles – short for smart active particles – can do just one thing: flap their two arms. But when researchers confined five of these smarticles in a circle, they begin to nudge one another, forming a robophysical system known as a “supersmarticle” that can move by itself. Adding a light or sound sensor allows the supersmarticle to move in response to the stimulus – and even be controlled well enough to navigate a maze.

Though rudimentary now, the notion of making robots from smaller robots – and taking advantage of the group capabilities that arise by combining individuals – could provide mechanically based control over very small robots. Ultimately, the emergent behaviour of the group could provide a new locomotion and control approach for small robots that could potentially change shapes.

“These are very rudimentary robots whose behaviour is dominated by mechanics and the laws of physics,” says Dan Goldman, a professor in the School of Physics at the Georgia Institute of Technology. “We are not looking to put sophisticated control, sensing, and computation on them all. As robots become smaller and smaller, we’ll have to use mechanics and physics principles to control them because they won’t have the level of computation and sensing we would need for conventional control.”

From staples to smarticles

The foundation for the research came from an unlikely source: a study of construction staples. By pouring these heavy-duty staples into a container with removable sides, former PhD student Nick Gravish – now a faculty member at the University of California, San Diego – created structures that would stand by themselves after researchers removed the container’s walls.

Shaking the staple towers eventually caused them to collapse, but the observations led to a realisation that simple entangling of mechanical objects could create structures with capabilities well beyond those of the individual components.

“A robot made of other rudimentary robots became the vision,” Goldman says. “You could imagine making a robot in which you would tweak its geometric parameters a bit and what emerges is qualitatively new behaviours.”

Close-up of a smarticle – smart active particle – showing the two 3D-printed arms, light sensor, and motor. (Georgia Tech Photo: Rob Felt)

Out of many, one

To explore the concept, graduate research assistant Will Savoie used a 3D printer to create battery-powered smarticles, which have motors, simple sensors, and limited computing power. The devices can change their location only when they interact with other devices while enclosed by a ring.

“Even though no individual robot could move on its own, the cloud composed of multiple robots could move as it pushed itself apart and shrink as it pulled itself together,” Goldman explains. “If you put a ring around the cloud of little robots, they start kicking each other around, and the larger ring – what we call a supersmarticle – moves around randomly.”

The researchers noticed that if one small robot stopped moving, perhaps because its battery died, the group of smarticles would begin moving in the direction of that stalled robot. Graduate student Ross Warkentin learned he could control the movement by adding photo sensors to the robots that halt the arm flapping when a strong beam of light hits one of them.

“If you angle the flashlight just right, you can highlight the robot you want to be inactive, and that causes the ring to lurch toward or away from it, even though no robots are programmed to move toward the light,” Goldman says. “That allowed steering of the ensemble in a very rudimentary, stochastic way.”

Kurt Wiesenfeld, a professor in the School of Physics, and graduate student Zack Jackson modelled the movement of the these smarticles and supersmarticles to understand how the nudges and mass of the ring affected overall movement. Researchers from Northwestern University studied how the interactions between the smarticles provided directional control.

‘Chaos of wiggling’

“For many robots, we have electrical current move motors that generate forces on parts that collectively move a robot reliably,” says Todd Murphey, a professor of mechanical engineering. “We learned that although individual smarticles interact with each other through a chaos of wiggling impacts that are each unpredictable, the whole robot composed of those smarticles moves predictably and in a way that we can exploit in software.”

In future work, Goldman envisions more complex interactions that utilise the simple sensing and movement capabilities of the smarticles. “People have been interested in making a certain kind of swarm robots that are composed of other robots,” he says. “These structures could be reconfigured on demand to meet specific needs by tweaking their geometry.”

The project is of interest to the US Army because it could lead to new robotic systems capable of changing their shapes, modalities, and functions, says Sam Stanton. He is program manager of complex dynamics and systems at the Army Research Office, an element of US Army Combat Capabilities Development Command’s Army Research Laboratory.

“Future Army unmanned systems and networks of systems are imagined to be capable of transforming their shape, modality, and function. For example, a robotic swarm may someday be capable of moving to a river and then autonomously forming a structure to span the gap,” Stanton says. “Dan Goldman’s research is identifying physical principles that may prove essential for engineering emergent behaviour in future robot collectives as well as new understanding of fundamental trade-offs in system performance, responsiveness, uncertainty, resiliency, and adaptivity.”

The research appears in the journal Science Robotics.

Source: Georgia Tech

The original article can be found on Futurity 


Print this page | E-mail this page