This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Five more years for the EN 954-1 safety standard? Consultant offers a cautious welcome

04 September 2009

Laidler Associates, the safety compliance consultant, has announced that it broadly welcomes the news that the replacement of the well-known EN 954-1 safety standard is likely to be delayed. Nevertheless, the company emphasises that this move does nothing to change the fact that EN 954-1 is deficient in many areas.

A new standard, EN (ISO) 13849-1 “Safety of machinery, Safety-related parts of control systems”, had been expected to replace EN 954-1 within the next few months. However, machine and control system builders expressed serious concerns about difficulties in applying the new standard in practice, particularly as it calls for component MTBF (mean time between failure) data that, in many cases, is not currently available.

In response to these concerns, the Machinery Directive Working Group of the European Environmental & Technical Regulation Directorate recently announced that it was receptive to the idea that EN 954-1 could continue to be accepted “for a certain time”, while it is still referenced by harmonised standards. It has been suggested that the extended period of acceptance is likely to be either three or five years.

“For most control system and machine builders, this is very good news,” said Paul Laidler, Managing Director of Laidler Associates, “since it gives time for the work needed to underpin the new EN 13849-1 standard to be carried out carefully and thoroughly. Nevertheless, retaining EN 954-1 does have its downside, as there are many areas that this standard doesn’t cover including, for example, programmable safety equipment, which simply didn’t exist when it was formulated.

“For this reason, control system and machine builders must be careful about placing too much reliance on EN 954-1 as a way of demonstrating that they have fully met their obligations in relation to control system safety. This is, in fact, a complex area where most companies will benefit from expert guidance.

“At Laidler, we have used our wide experience in industrial safety and compliance to carefully analyse this complex situation and the issues it creates. As a result, we are in a prime position to provide that guidance.”

Laidler’s focus in providing consultancy services for EN 954-1 and EN 18439-1 is to work with its clients to develop comprehensive and dependable solutions that are practical, convenient and cost effective.


Contact Details and Archive...

Print this page | E-mail this page