This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Software lets you edit photos with the power of your mind

30 June 2022

Software has been developed that could allow humans to edit photos via ‘mind control’ – electric signals from the brain.

(Image: Shutterstock)
(Image: Shutterstock)

“We can make a computer edit images entirely based on thoughts generated by human subjects. The computer has absolutely no prior information about which features it is supposed to edit or how. Nobody has ever done this before,” says Tuukka Ruotsalo, an Associate Professor in the computer science department at the University of Copenhagen.

In the new study, 30 participants were equipped with hoods containing electrodes which map electrical brain signals (electroencephalography or EEG). All participants were given the same 200 different facial images to look at. Also, they were given a series of tasks such as looking for female faces, looking for older people, looking for blond hair, etc.

The participants would not perform any actions, just look briefly at the images – 0.5 seconds for each image. Based on their brain activity, the machine first maps the given preference and then edits the images accordingly. So, if the task was to look for older people, the computer would modify the portraits of the younger persons, making them look older. And if the task was to look for a given hair colour, everybody would get that colour.

“Notably, the computer had no knowledge of face recognition and would have no idea about gender, hair colour, or any other relevant features. Still, it only edited the feature in question, leaving other facial features unchanged,” says Keith Davis, a PhD student at the University of Helsinki.

Some may argue that plenty of software capable of manipulating facial features already exist. That would be missing the point, Davis says.

“All the existing software has been previously trained with labelled input. So, if you want an app which can make people look older, you feed it thousands of portraits and tell the computer which ones are young, and which are old,” he says. “
Here, the brain activity of the subjects was the only input. This is an entirely new paradigm in artificial intelligence – using the human brain directly as the source of input.”

One possible application for the new work could be in medicine.

“Doctors already use artificial intelligence in interpretation of scanning images. However, mistakes do happen. After all, the doctors are only assisted by the images but will take the decisions themselves. Maybe certain features in the images are more often misinterpreted than others. Such patterns might be discovered through an application of our research,” says Ruotsalo.

Another application could be assistance to certain groups of disabled people, for instance allowing a paralysed person to operate their computer.

“That would be fantastic,” says Ruotsalo. “However, that is not the focus of our research. We have a broad scope, looking to improve machine learning in general. The range of possible applications will be wide. For instance, 10 or 20 years from now we may not need to use a mouse or type commands to operate our computer. Maybe we can just use mind control!”
There are some reasons for caution, however, according to Ruotsalo.

“Collecting individual brain signals does involve ethical issues. Whoever acquires this knowledge could potentially obtain deep insight into a person’s preferences. We already see some trends. People buy smartwatches and similar devices able to record heart rate etc., but are we sure that data are not generated which give private corporations knowledge which we wouldn’t want to share?”

“I see this as an important aspect of academic work. Our research shows what is possible, but we shouldn’t do things just because they can be done. This is an area which in my view needs to be regulated by guidelines and public policies. If these are not adapted, private companies will just go ahead.”


Print this page | E-mail this page